A struggling US-listed company on the brink of delisting suddenly pivots to holding cryptocurrencies—and its market valuation soars overnight. What’s really happening?
Last Tuesday, SharpLink Gaming Inc. was a little-known sports betting marketing firm trading at around $2.91 per share, with a market cap of just $2 million. Though still listed on Nasdaq, the company was in trouble. It had recently executed a reverse stock split to avoid falling below the exchange’s $1 minimum share price requirement and failed to meet Nasdaq’s $2.5 million stockholders’ equity threshold.
That day, SharpLink announced a new equity offering, raising $4.5 million at $2.94 per share. Officially, the funds were meant to “restore compliance with Nasdaq’s equity requirements.” But the company also noted: “We may use a portion of the proceeds to purchase cryptocurrency as part of a treasury strategy under consideration.”
This might seem unusual, but it’s increasingly common. SharpLink, like many micro-cap firms, functions more as a listed shell company than an operating business. Its small size and limited revenue make it difficult to sustain the costs of being publicly traded. In the past, this was a problem.
In 2025, it’s an opportunity.
SharpLink possesses two highly sought-after assets:
- A US-listed shell company,
- One that isn’t busy doing much else.
This makes it an ideal vehicle for a “crypto treasury transformation.” As I’ve often noted, the US stock market is willing to pay more than $2 for every $1 of crypto assets—a phenomenon crypto entrepreneurs have eagerly capitalized on. If you hold significant amounts of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, or even meme coins, one of the best ways to monetize them is to place them inside a US-listed company and sell them to public market investors at a premium.
But to do that, you need a listed company. High-quality firms like Apple aren’t interested. The real targets are those barely clinging to their listings—companies whose phones are now ringing off the hook.
Consider SharpLink’s recent announcement:
- A $425 million private placement to fund an Ethereum treasury strategy,
- Joseph Lubin, co-founder of Ethereum and CEO of Consensys, becoming board chairman,
- Participation from top crypto VCs and firms, including Pantera Capital, Galaxy Digital, and Arrington Capital.
In essence, Consensys and its partners are using SharpLink’s shell to hold $425 million in ETH—valued by the market at $2.5 billion after the announcement. SharpLink’s stock price surged from under $3 to over $35, and its market cap ballooned to $2.5 billion.
It’s worth emphasizing: SharpLink doesn’t actually hold any ETH yet. Investors provided cash, not crypto. This isn’t about taking existing crypto holdings public; it’s about exploiting a clear arbitrage opportunity—if public markets are willing to pay $5 for $1 of crypto, why not take advantage?
This isn’t entirely new. Remember the New Jersey snack shop that once reached a $2 billion fully diluted market cap? It was simply ahead of its time. That company, like SharpLink, was a shell designed for reverse mergers—often with foreign private companies. Its operators faced legal trouble for stock manipulation, but the underlying model remains relevant.
If that snack shop had merged with a $425 million Ethereum pool today, its $2 billion valuation might have seemed almost reasonable.
Why Is This Still Working?
I’ve written extensively about “crypto treasury companies” in recent months. MicroStrategy pioneered this strategy years ago and continues to execute it successfully. But why are investors still rewarding imitators?
MicroStrategy is a large, established company with a professional investor relations team, a compelling narrative for retail investors, substantial Bitcoin holdings, and inclusion in leveraged ETFs and indices. It arguably deserves some premium.
But the market’s appetite for smaller, newer crypto treasury companies seems endless. It’s as if the crypto world keeps fooling the stock market—and the stock market keeps falling for it.
Why Are More Companies Doing This?
It’s simple: if you run a crypto fund and haven’t acquired a dormant US-listed shell to execute this arbitrage, you’re arguably underperforming.
For crypto-adjacent firms, transforming a public shell into a crypto treasury offers the lowest cost of capital globally. We’ve seen Tether, SoftBank, Bitfinex, and Nakamoto Holdings enter the fray. Even Trump Media & Technology Group is reportedly considering it.
Most of these companies are small, neglected shells. established firms like Apple won’t participate—they have real businesses to run.
Similarly, many crypto builders, like Ethereum’s Vitalik Buterin, are focused on protocol development—not packaging crypto for stock investors. But for others, the valuation premium is too tempting to ignore.
How Do You Actually Cash Out?
SharpLink’s transformation created $2 billion in paper profits. Now what?
Typically, private placement investors face lock-up periods and registration requirements before they can sell. The consortium behind SharpLink owns 97% of the company. selling that stake would take years given the stock’s low liquidity—and would likely crash the price.
Modern finance has found a way to create billions in market value with minimal effort. But if you can’t convert paper gains into cash, it’s just a magic trick. You’re a paper billionaire holding illiquid stock in a company that was worth $2 million a week ago.
There are practical answers: “They now control a multi-billion-dollar company with a low cost of capital. They can issue more shares to buy additional crypto, expanding their empire and influence. They can pay themselves generous salaries.”
But these investors already had hundreds of millions. They didn’t do this for a job.
The real question is: How do they unlock that $2 billion?
I don’t have a perfect answer—if I did, I’d be implementing it myself. But this dilemma is deeply “crypto-native.” It mirrors a classic crypto wealth story:
- You create magic beans (a new token) and hold most of them,
- The market trades them at high prices, creating a huge paper valuation,
- You’re a billionaire on paper, but selling would crash the market,
- You enjoy prestige and resources but know the magic bean market may not last.
The most famous example is FTX. Sam Bankman-Fried’s empire was built on crypto assets largely valued by his own ecosystem. When confidence collapsed, so did the valuation.
In crypto, you might borrow against magic beans. As SBF once explained, you can collateralize tokens in lending protocols, take out dollars, and default without recourse—effectively cashing out.
But in public markets, even with a 100,000% gain and 97% ownership, borrowing against your stock is challenging.
Still, I’d try.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a crypto treasury company?
A publicly traded company that holds significant cryptocurrencies—often Bitcoin or Ethereum—as part of its treasury strategy. Investors buy the stock to gain indirect crypto exposure, often at a premium to the underlying asset value.
Why are investors paying a premium for these stocks?
Some investors cannot directly purchase crypto or ETFs due to regulatory or internal restrictions. Others believe the company’s strategy will outperform the market or appreciate the leveraged exposure through corporate debt-funded purchases.
What are the risks involved?
These stocks are often volatile, illiquid, and trade at high valuations relative to their crypto holdings. If crypto prices fall, the stock may fall further due to the premium evaporating. Regulatory changes or exchange delistings could also negatively impact them.
Can retail investors participate?
Yes, but cautiously. These stocks can be highly speculative and are often subject to extreme price swings. It’s essential to understand the company’s structure, custody arrangements, and the liquidity of its crypto holdings.
How do these companies choose which cryptocurrencies to hold?
Most focus on Bitcoin or Ethereum due to their liquidity and market recognition. However, some smaller companies hold alternative coins, which can increase risk due to lower liquidity and higher volatility.
Are these strategies legal?
Generally, yes—as long as the company complies with securities laws, discloses its strategy clearly, and follows corporate governance rules. However, regulators are increasingly scrutinizing these activities, especially when they involve market manipulation or fraud.
The Road to Cashing Out: Lessons from Crypto
In crypto, some have successfully “cashed out” of magic beans—though not always legally.
In October 2022, trader Avi Eisenberg manipulated the price of MNGO tokens on Mango Markets, a decentralized perpetual futures exchange. He used his artificially inflated positions as collateral to borrow over $100 million in crypto—all without recourse, meaning he had no obligation to repay.
He was arrested but later had his fraud conviction overturned. The court ruled that because Mango Markets didn’t explicitly prohibit market manipulation—and because the loans were non-recourse—Eisenberg hadn’t committed fraud by exploiting the system.
This case highlights two key issues:
- Jurisdiction: Eisenberg was tried in New York, but the platforms he used were based offshore or decentralized,
- The line between manipulation and innovation: In systems where the code allows certain actions, users may argue they’re simply playing by the rules.
The ruling suggests that code can become law—if a platform doesn’t prohibit an action, executing it might not be illegal. This has profound implications for DeFi and traditional finance.
For crypto treasury companies, the lesson is clear: cashing out requires creativity—and sometimes, risk-taking. While Eisenberg’s approach isn’t replicable in public markets, it illustrates the lengths some will go to monetize paper gains.
👉 Explore advanced crypto investment strategies
Ultimately, the crypto treasury trend reflects a broader shift: traditional markets are embracing crypto, but not always wisely. Whether this ends well remains to be seen—but for now, the magic trick keeps working.