The brokerage sector is actively expanding its services to include virtual asset trading. This move represents a significant shift as traditional financial institutions embrace the growing digital asset ecosystem.
A key development occurred recently when Guotai Junan International Holdings Limited became the first Chinese-backed brokerage in Hong Kong to receive approval for providing comprehensive virtual asset-related trading services. This approval, which arrived ahead of market expectations, is seen as a major milestone. Analysts suggest this not only marks the formal entry of Chinese brokerages into the virtual asset sector under a regulatory framework but could also open up new international business opportunities for more firms in the industry.
The Strategic "Type 1 License Upgrade"
In February 2025, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong released its "A-S-P-I-Re" (Access, Safeguards, Products, Infrastructure, and Engagement) roadmap for regulating the virtual asset market. This policy provided a clear direction for the development of Hong Kong's virtual asset ecosystem.
Supportive policies and a flexible licensing upgrade system have created a pathway for Chinese brokerages to integrate traditional services with virtual asset offerings. On June 24th, Guotai Junan International, a subsidiary of the Guotai Junan Group, formally received approval from the Hong Kong SFC. This approval upgraded its existing securities trading license to include providing virtual asset trading services and offering advice in conjunction with those services. Following this upgrade, clients can directly trade cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, and other virtual assets on the Guotai Junan International platform.
Consequently, Guotai Junan International is now the first Hong Kong-based Chinese brokerage to offer a full suite of virtual asset services. These services encompass providing virtual asset trading, offering advice during the trading process, and issuing and distributing virtual asset-related products, including over-the-counter derivatives.
Xu Kang, Chief Financial Analyst at Huachuang Securities, stated, "This move is commonly referred to in Hong Kong as a 'Type 1 License upgrade.' Guotai Junan International was an early mover in this area, and the approval came sooner than anticipated. It is expected that more Chinese brokerages with international business subsidiaries will complete similar license upgrades, moving into virtual asset trading services and further improving the market ecosystem. Particularly, major brokerages with a strong client base are likely to enter the field."
👉 Explore more strategies for navigating digital asset markets
Leading by Example: The Head Brokerage Effect
Hong Kong's strategic determination to develop its virtual asset market is clear. Leveraging its mature financial infrastructure and international regulatory framework, the region's virtual asset industry is developing rapidly. Furthermore, by capitalizing on the innovative synergy and open market advantages of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, Hong Kong is accelerating its consolidation as a global core hub for virtual assets. Within this trend, traditional financial institutions are continuously strengthening their license portfolios and business layouts.
Information on the Hong Kong SFC website shows there are currently 11 licensed virtual asset trading platforms. These encompass a diverse range of entities, including those with traditional financial institution backing and those led by technology firms. The license upgrade obtained by Guotai Junan International is likely to provide a practical model for other industry players to emulate, potentially expanding their international business development space.
Sun Ting, Chief Non-Bank Financial Analyst at Soochow Securities, noted, "Guotai Junan International has demonstrated to the market that major Chinese brokerages have the capacity to undertake compliant virtual asset operations, paving the way for peers like CITIC Securities and China International Capital Corporation (CICC), which also have Hong Kong subsidiaries." She added that the focus of industry competition would shift from low-value-added, homogeneous channel services to building core capabilities as a "cross-border digital financial infrastructure." This infrastructure rests on two pillars: a "clearing hub" and a "securitization engine." This shift can not only optimize revenue structures by increasing the proportion of high-fee business but also, through the allocation needs of stablecoin reserve assets, open a new channel for brokerages to expand their balance sheets, achieving synergistic growth between capital-light and capital-heavy businesses.
Navigating Risks and Challenges
It is important to note that the high volatility and technological innovativeness of virtual asset trading also present a test for the risk management systems of traditional financial institutions.
Zheng Lei, Chief Economist at the Samoyed Cloud Technology Group, commented on the challenges: "There are currently systematic differences between virtual assets and traditional financial assets, which presents both opportunities and challenges for traditional brokerages. On the positive side, Hong Kong's principle of 'same business, same risks, same rules' for new financial businesses like virtual assets means that as long as traditional brokerages enter areas related to existing financial asset management, their current risk control systems can be adapted and transplanted, such as for virtual asset management. However, for areas like stablecoins and Real World Assets (RWA), traditional brokerages not only need to upgrade their existing trading systems but also require significant investment in IT technology and infrastructure. Given the current market depth and scale of virtual assets, the return on investment is not yet ideal. While some institutions have already applied for relevant trading service licenses, whether they can quickly expand their business into related product and service areas remains to be seen."
Due diligence and a robust understanding of the associated risks are paramount for any firm or investor considering this new asset class. The technological and regulatory landscape continues to evolve, demanding constant vigilance and adaptation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does a 'Type 1 License upgrade' mean in Hong Kong?
A 'Type 1 License upgrade' refers to the process where a licensed securities firm gains additional regulatory approval from the Hong Kong SFC to offer virtual asset trading services alongside its traditional securities trading activities. It expands the scope of the firm's existing license.
Why is Guotai Junan International's approval significant?
It is significant because it is the first Chinese-backed brokerage in Hong Kong to receive such approval. This sets a precedent and provides a regulatory roadmap for other established financial institutions looking to enter the virtual asset market in a compliant manner.
What services can a brokerage with this upgraded license provide?
The license allows the firm to provide virtual asset trading services, offer investment advice in connection with those trading services, and also to issue and distribute virtual asset-related financial products, such as derivatives.
What are the main risks associated with virtual asset trading?
The primary risks include high price volatility, technological complexity and associated cybersecurity threats, regulatory uncertainty in some jurisdictions, and the potential for liquidity issues. Traditional risk management frameworks must be adapted to address these unique challenges.
How does Hong Kong's approach to virtual asset regulation differ?
Hong Kong has adopted a comprehensive regulatory framework aimed at integrating virtual assets into its existing financial system with clear rules for investor protection, market integrity, and anti-money laundering. Its "A-S-P-I-Re" roadmap outlines a commitment to fostering innovation while ensuring safeguards.
Will more traditional brokerages enter this space?
Analysts expect more brokerages, especially large firms with strong international client bases and subsidiaries in Hong Kong, to pursue similar license upgrades and enter the virtual asset services market, following the precedent set by Guotai Junan International.